Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
RMD Open ; 6(3)2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-814261

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: There is emerging evidence that COVID-19 disproportionately affects people from racial/ethnic minority and low socioeconomic status (SES) groups. Many physicians across the globe are changing practice patterns in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to examine the practice changes among rheumatologists and what they perceive the impact to be on their most vulnerable patients. METHODS: We administered an online survey to a convenience sample of rheumatologists worldwide during the initial height of the pandemic (between 8 April and 4 May 2020) via social media and group emails. We surveyed rheumatologists about their opinions regarding patients from low SES and racial/ethnic minority groups in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Mainly, what their specific concerns were, including the challenges of medication access; and about specific social factors (health literacy, poverty, food insecurity, access to telehealth video) that may be complicating the management of rheumatologic conditions during this time. RESULTS: 548 rheumatologists responded from 64 countries and shared concerns of food insecurity, low health literacy, poverty and factors that preclude social distancing such as working and dense housing conditions among their patients. Although 82% of rheumatologists had switched to telehealth video, 17% of respondents estimated that about a quarter of their patients did not have access to telehealth video, especially those from below the poverty line. The majority of respondents believed these vulnerable patients, from racial/ethnic minorities and from low SES groups, would do worse, in terms of morbidity and mortality, during the pandemic. CONCLUSION: In this sample of rheumatologists from 64 countries, there is a clear shift in practice to telehealth video consultations and widespread concern for socially and economically vulnerable patients with rheumatic disease.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes/etnología , Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Etnicidad , Grupos Minoritarios , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Pobreza , Grupos Raciales , Enfermedades Reumáticas/etnología , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/mortalidad , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Abastecimiento de Alimentos/economía , Alfabetización en Salud , Vivienda , Humanos , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Neumonía Viral/virología , Enfermedades Reumáticas/mortalidad , Reumatólogos , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Telemedicina
3.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 26(6): 224-228, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-660018

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: With hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and chloroquine (CQ) emerging as potential therapies for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), shortages have been reported. We aimed to understand how rheumatologists, one of the most common prescribers of HCQ/CQ, prescribed these medications to manage COVID-19 and to understand if their patients are affected by shortages. METHODS: Between April 8 and April 27, 2020, an online survey was distributed to a convenience sample of rheumatologists who practice medicine in a diverse range of settings globally, resulting in 506 responses. Adjusted Poisson regression models were calculated. RESULTS: Only 6% of respondents prescribed HCQ/CQ for COVID-19 prophylaxis, and only 12% for outpatient treatment of COVID-19. Compared to the United States, the likelihood of prescribing HCQ/CQ for prophylaxis was higher in India (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 6.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7-16.8; p < 0.001). Further, compared to the United States and those with 1 to 5 years of experience, rheumatologists in Europe (aRR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.6-5.3; p < 0.001) and those with 10+ years of experience (11-20 years: aRR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2-5.3; p = 0.015; 21+ years: aRR = 3.3; 95% CI, 1.4-7.4; p = 0.004) had a higher likelihood of prescribing HCQ/CQ for outpatient treatment. Of note, 71% of all rheumatologists reported that their patients were directly affected by HCQ/CQ shortages. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that only a small percentage of rheumatologists are prescribing HCQ/CQ for prophylaxis or outpatient treatment of COVID-19. Medication shortages experienced by large numbers of autoimmune disease patients are concerning and should play a role in decisions, especially given poor efficacy data for HCQ/CQ in COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéutico , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Reumatología , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19
4.
Lancet Rheumatol ; 2(10): e582-e583, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-639350
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA